Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Cassidy results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,615 hits. Analysis detected 11,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,132 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,853 of 16,562 topics). This Bill Cassidy is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Bill Cassidy
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos