Topic summary
30% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Awards And Recognition results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 1,560 hits . Analysis detected 9,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,274 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (9,996 of 16,562 topics). This Awards And Recognition is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Awards And Recognition
Topic details
Total words: 9,274
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 16.8% 16.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst