Topic summary
29%8 analyzed articles/videos6,406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Autonomous Systems results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 3,380 hits. Analysis detected 22,430 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,360 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,438 of 15,765 topics). This Autonomous Systems is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Autonomous Systems

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.9%13.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate