Author summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Nusbaum results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 3,605 hits . Analysis detected 17,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,780 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,409 of 6,628 authors). This David Nusbaum is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. David Nusbaum
Author details
Total words: 9,780
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 36.9% 36.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.2% 16.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 36.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst