Topic summary
83% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Australia results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,747 hits . Analysis detected 16,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,575 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,462 of 15,778 topics). This Australia is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Australia
Topic details
Total words: 12,575
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.1% 8.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst