Topic summary
23%1 analyzed article/video1,045 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attachment Styles results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Unattributed Quote, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 2,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,225 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,489 of 16,266 topics). This Attachment Styles is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Attachment Styles
Topic details
Total words: 5,225
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos