Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,097 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assembly Bill 1581 results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 2,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,090 of 15,266 topics). This Assembly Bill 1581 is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Assembly Bill 1581
Topic details
Total words: 4,388
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst