KQED61%

‘Feels Like Erasure’: Why Native American Students May Be Undercounted by 90% in California Schools 7%

By Carolyn Jones23% CalMatters31%

5/23/2026, 7:00:35 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 1,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,097 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22.9% and a BS Rank of 7% (18,928 of 20,155 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the article peer group.

This story was originally published by CalMatters. 
Sign up for their newsletters. 
When Celestina Castillo filled out the ethnicity forms at her children’s school, she’d always check Latino and Native American. 
After all, the family is proud of both its heritages. 
But because of a loophole in the state’s data collection system, checking Latino or Hispanic meant that her children’s Native American identity was not counted at all, and they would not receive the extra services they’re entitled to. 
When Castillo learned of this, she stopped checking the Latino box altogether. 
According to the arcane way California counts its 5.8 million students, students who say they are Hispanic and Native American get counted as solely Hispanic. 
Native American students who also identify as another race, such as Black, white or Asian, are counted as “two or more races,” not Native American. 
The problem affects all multiracial students, but it’s especially pronounced among Native Americans because the majority are multiracial. 
It’s resulted in an undercount of Native American students by as much as 90%, advocates said. 
“If someone is Black, or Asian, or white, they’re counted that way,” said Castillo, a director of a college learning center who lives in Los Angeles. 
“Why does it not count if someone is Native American? 
That’s not OK. 
It feels like erasure.” 
More services, fewer stereotypes 
Last year, California schools said they had 24,822 Native American students, but the actual number may be as high as 156,000, according to an Assembly report on a new measure, Assembly Bill 1581, that seeks to fix the problem. 
If those students were identified, they’d be entitled to cultural services and other programs that could help them succeed in school. 
A more accurate count could also change the public perception of Native Americans generally, according to Assemblymember James Ramos, the San Bernardino Democrat who authored the bill. 
Instead of being thought of as rare or even extinct, the public could see that Native Americans are everywhere, Ramos said. 
“We’ll start to see the true picture of Native Americans in California,” said Ramos, a member of the Serrano/Cahuilla tribe. 
“Native American students should be able to stand up in the classroom and say who they are and be proud of it.” 
Changes in the U.S. 
Census 
There’s a long history of the government marginalizing Native Americans in California, particularly in schools. 
In the late 19th and 20th centuries, not long after 90% of California’s Native American population was murdered or killed by disease, the federal government forced thousands of Native American children in California into boarding schools, where they were forced to speak English and abandon their cultures. 
Things started to change in 1970 when the U.S. 
Census Bureau started improving the way it counted Native Americans. 
Now, Native Americans can write in their tribal affiliation or list themselves as multiracial, and still be counted as Native American. 
Although Native Americans are still undercounted more than any other ethnic group, the census changes resulted in a tenfold increase in the official number of Native Americans in the U.S. 
In 1960, Native Americans only made up .3% of the population. 
In 2020, they were almost 3%. 
Indigenous studies materials at a booth for California State University during the California Native American Day celebration at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Sept. 
22, 2023. 
(Miguel Gutierrez Jr. 
/CalMatters) 
The improved census data also revealed that California has more Native Americans than any other state. 
More than 760,000 people in California identify as Native American, with most living in urban areas like Los Angeles. 
Ramos’ bill would allow Native American students to write in the name of their tribe on school forms and identify as Native American plus another race, if applicable. 
The hope is to give a more comprehensive, more nuanced view of California’s Native American student population, allowing them to get extra services regardless of their biracial identity. 
So far, the bill has no opposition. 
‘We’re in the modern world, too’ 
Shannon Rivers, who works on education issues for the Los Angeles-based California Native Vote Project, said an accurate count of Native Americans is essential to dispel stereotypes and bring public awareness to issues affecting Native American communities. 
“In the eyes of many Americans, there’s still this image of Native American people from the past, from the 1800s,” said Rivers, who is a member of the Akimel O’odham tribe in Arizona. 
“That history is important, but we’re in the modern world, too. 
We’re doctors, lawyers, scientists, artists, educators.” 
Assemblymember James Ramos, a Democrat from Rancho Cucamonga, speaks during an assembly floor meeting at the state Capitol in Sacramento, on April 18, 2022. 
(Rahul Lal/CalMatters) 
He’s hopeful that Ramos’ bill will improve conditions generally for Native American students in California schools. 
With more accurate student counts, schools could get more federal and state funding to provide extra services, such as tutoring, to Native American children. 
More schools could host events and curriculum centered on Native American history and culture. 
When Ramos was growing up in San Bernardino, he remembers staring at the ethnicity form at school and not knowing what bubble to fill. 
His mother was Native American, but she was labeled “white” on her birth certificate. 
His father, also Native American, was labeled “Hispanic.” 
“Were we white or Latino? 
I didn’t know. 
We had to accept whatever the school told us we were,” Ramos said. 
“I’d go home and ask, ‘Are we Caucasian?’ 
That started a whole other conversation. 
It was confusing.” 
Castillo, a descendant of the Tohono O’odham tribe in Arizona and Sonora, Mexico, said that as a child, she thought everyone was Native American. 
But when she started school, she realized that very few people identified as she did, and worse, it was stigmatized. 
Years later, she saw her own children singled out as oddities. 
One day, her son, who had long hair, was dressed for a Native American dance, and another child pointed and said, “Look, Mom, it’s an Indian!” 
“My son felt like a dinosaur or a unicorn, like we didn’t exist,” Castillo said. 
By leaving the ethnicity question blank on school forms, Castillo knew it meant her children would not receive extra services they’re entitled to, either at the charter school they attend or through Los Angeles Unified. 
“That angered me,” Castillo said. 
“I’m hoping that this bill will help make Native students visible to local and state education policy makers.” 
This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.5%Carolyn Jones: 3.2%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias2.5%This article: 0.5%Carolyn Jones: 2.0%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.5%This article: 6.7%Carolyn Jones: 1.9%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic6.7%This article: 1.6%Carolyn Jones: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.6%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Carolyn Jones: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 9.5%Carolyn Jones: 3.2%CalMatters: 6.4%Framing Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.4%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.9%Carolyn Jones: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 23.6%Carolyn Jones: 6.5%CalMatters: 3.6%Optimism Bias23.6%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.2%Carolyn Jones: 4.6%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias17.2%This article: 0.9%Carolyn Jones: 0.4%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.9%This article: 6.7%Carolyn Jones: 2.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error6.7%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Carolyn Jones: 0.5%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.5%Carolyn Jones: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.5%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.6%Carolyn Jones: 1.4%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.3%Carolyn Jones: 3.8%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority15.3%This article: 1.5%Carolyn Jones: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.2%False Dilemma1.5%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.8%Carolyn Jones: 3.0%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization9.8%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.6%Carolyn Jones: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 6.7%Carolyn Jones: 2.9%CalMatters: 5.4%Appeal to Emotion6.7%This article: 2.1%Carolyn Jones: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 29.7%Carolyn Jones: 8.8%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)29.7%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 1.6%Carolyn Jones: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division1.6%This article: 14.3%Carolyn Jones: 4.7%CalMatters: 3.2%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Carolyn Jones: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.9%Carolyn Jones: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.9%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.5%Carolyn Jones: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote1.5%This article: 0.4%Carolyn Jones: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.4%This article: 9.3%Carolyn Jones: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice9.3%This article: 2.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.3%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination2.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carolyn Jones: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.5%Carolyn Jones: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.5%

1097 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers47%attributed speech580writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 26 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageShannon Rivers • 37 words • 0.0% coverageShannon Rivers • 33 words • 0.0% coverageShannon Rivers • 11 words • 0.0% coverageShannon Rivers • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 24 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJames Ramos • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 24 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 11 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 26 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 35 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 5 words • 0.0% coverageCelestina Castillo • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Shannon Rivers

100%flagged-word coverage
87 attributed words17% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.6 ptsWriter: 17.6%Shannon Rivers: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Shannon Rivers: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -0.9 ptsWriter: 0.9%Shannon Rivers: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.