Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,526 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carolyn Jones results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 763 hits . Analysis detected 5,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,675 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,125 of 6,138 authors). This Carolyn Jones is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Carolyn Jones
Author details
Total words: 8,675
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst