Topic summary
⁠43%5 analyzed articles/videos2,917 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Assassination Attempt results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 926 hits. Analysis detected 7,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,418 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (11,068 of 15,785 topics). This Assassination Attempt is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Assassination Attempt

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510029.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos