Topic summary
⁠62%3 analyzed articles/videos2,554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Encounters results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,166 hits. Analysis detected 6,411 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,132 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (14,030 of 16,559 topics). This Animal Encounters is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Animal Encounters
Topic details
Total words: 9,132
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510015.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos