Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos7,851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 2,863 hits. Analysis detected 25,582 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,446 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,553 of 16,562 topics). This Animal is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Animal
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles27.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos