Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claudia Posada results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 1,928 hits . Analysis detected 8,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,815 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (765 of 6,628 authors). This Claudia Posada is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Claudia Posada
Author details
Total words: 4,815
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.5% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 40.0% 40.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.7% 12.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 7.8% 7.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 40.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.8%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst