Topic summary
53% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,711 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Burnham results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 2,873 hits . Analysis detected 29,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,473 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,822 of 16,558 topics). This Andy Burnham is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Andy Burnham
Topic details
Total words: 27,473
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles27.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst