Topic summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Tate results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 339 hits. Analysis detected 3,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,750 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (8,783 of 15,326 topics). This Andrew Tate is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Andrew Tate
Topic details
Total words: 3,750
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos