Topic summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Album Review results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 779 hits. Analysis detected 4,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,764 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,686 of 16,559 topics). This Album Review is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Album Review
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,764
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos