Author summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Patrick Hooper results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 2,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,528 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,803 of 6,256 authors). This Ryan Patrick Hooper is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Ryan Patrick Hooper
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
40%Ryan Patrick Hooper (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,528
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate