Topic summary
58% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,422 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Air Defense results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,138 hits . Analysis detected 9,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,585 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (12,224 of 16,562 topics). This Air Defense is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. Air Defense
Topic details
Total words: 11,585
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst