Topic summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Startups results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 965 hits . Analysis detected 7,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,467 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,678 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Startups is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. Ai Startups
Topic details
Total words: 4,467
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 15.4% 15.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 16.4% 16.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst