Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Heim results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,718 hits . Analysis detected 15,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,313 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,690 of 6,449 authors). This Anna Heim is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Anna Heim
Author details
Total words: 19,313
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.9% 8.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst