Topic summary
⁠50%1 analyzed article/video677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Risks results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 714 hits. Analysis detected 3,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,419 of 16,562 topics). This AI Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
AI Risks
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠62%AI Risks (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,708
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.4%26.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos