Topic summary
⁠80%3 analyzed articles/videos918 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Integration results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,186 hits. Analysis detected 8,316 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,674 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,112 of 15,832 topics). This Ai Integration is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Ai Integration
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,674
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
4.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 16.1%16.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.0%12.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.0%20.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos