Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 496 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorraine Taylor results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Overconfidence Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 53% saturation with 788 hits . Analysis detected 4,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 98% (161 of 6,611 authors). This Lorraine Taylor is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Lorraine Taylor
Author details
Total words: 1,488
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.6% percentile 15.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 42.3% 42.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 43.8% 43.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 38.4% 38.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 53.0% 53.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 21.9% 21.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 15.5% 15.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 19.1% 19.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Author 53.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 43.8%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 42.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 38.4%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 21.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 15.9%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Author 15.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst