Topic summary
⁠46%4 analyzed articles/videos2,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai In The Workplace results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,182 hits. Analysis detected 9,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,516 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,506 of 15,847 topics). This Ai In The Workplace is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Ai In The Workplace
Topic details
Total words: 10,516
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos