Topic summary
71% 23 analyzed articles/videos 12,836 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ai Development results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 5,182 hits . Analysis detected 63,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,568 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (12,474 of 16,562 topics). This Ai Development is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Ai Development
Topic details
Total words: 58,568
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score23 analyzed articles58.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst