Topic summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordable Housing Policy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,560 of 15,690 topics). This Affordable Housing Policy is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Affordable Housing Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,223
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst