Topic summary
59%1 analyzed article/video741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Affordable Housing Policy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (8,560 of 15,690 topics). This Affordable Housing Policy is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Affordable Housing Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,223
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos