Topic summary
49%3 analyzed articles/videos754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Addiction Treatment results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 896 hits. Analysis detected 6,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,698 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,320 of 16,562 topics). This Addiction Treatment is better (less manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
Addiction Treatment
Topic details
Total words: 6,698
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510043.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate