Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 564 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lev Facher results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 906 hits . Analysis detected 5,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,256 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (555 of 6,628 authors). This Lev Facher is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Lev Facher
Author details
Total words: 2,256
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.6% percentile 7.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 40.2% 40.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 27.6% 27.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 37.0% 37.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 19.1% 19.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.6% 10.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 40.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 37.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 28.4%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 27.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.6%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst