Speaker summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zeinab Oumais results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 1,633.898 faulty-reasoning hits from 769 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,596 of 28,364 speakers). This Zeinab Oumais is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Zeinab Oumais
Speaker details
Total words: 769
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 7.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos769 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 33.4% 33.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 18.2% 18.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 27.2% 27.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst