Speaker summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos68.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yurii Ihnat results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Indoctrination, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 161.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,595 of 28,364 speakers). This Yurii Ihnat is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Yurii Ihnat
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
30.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos68.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 34.6%34.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 34.6%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos