Speaker summary
⁠56%4 analyzed articles/videos339.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yul-san Liem results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 964.821 faulty-reasoning hits from 339.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (24,101 of 26,856 speakers). This Yul-san Liem is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Yul-san Liem
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 339.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
025507510010.3% percentile
9.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos339.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 24.7%24.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%No True Scotsman: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos