Speaker summary
⁠28%2 analyzed articles/videos198.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Orrick results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Recency Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 198.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,806 of 28,364 speakers). This William Orrick is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
William Orrick
Speaker details
Total words: 198.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
10.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos198.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos