Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Hill results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 63.4% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 39% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,063 of 28,218 speakers). This William Hill is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
William Hill
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
39.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 63.4%63.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 26.8%26.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 63.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos