Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chloe Veltman results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 909 hits . Analysis detected 9,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,746 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,878 of 6,361 authors). This Chloe Veltman is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group. Chloe Veltman
Author details
Total words: 8,746
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.8% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst