Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These William Dahut results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,470 of 28,364 speakers). This William Dahut is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
William Dahut
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos