Speaker summary
⁠47%3 analyzed articles/videos278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whoopi Goldberg results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 94.54 hits. Analysis detected 563.645 faulty-reasoning hits from 278 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (27,134 of 28,364 speakers). This Whoopi Goldberg is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Whoopi Goldberg
Speaker details
Total words: 278
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
6.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos278 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.4%14.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos