Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These white house results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,478 of 26,780 speakers). This white house is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
white house
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos