Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Volodymyr Zalensky results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Unattributed Quote, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 91 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,347 of 28,364 speakers). This Volodymyr Zalensky is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Volodymyr Zalensky
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Lindsey Graham⁠17%
Rolling Stone⁠40%By Sean Woods⁠38%7/12/2026, 5:45:00 AM