Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vinay Prasad results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.9% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 378 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,707 of 28,240 speakers). This Vinay Prasad is better (less manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Vinay Prasad
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.9% percentile
30.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 60.9%60.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 47.4%47.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.7%23.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 60.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos