Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 851 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Johnson results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 645 hits . Analysis detected 4,987 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,832 of 6,268 authors). This Benjamin Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Benjamin Johnson
Author details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 13.3% 13.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 13.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst