Speaker summary
⁠32%4 analyzed articles/videos71.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Treasury Department results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 71.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,082 of 28,364 speakers). This US Treasury Department is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
US Treasury Department
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
18.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos71.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.8%22.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos