Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos210.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Forest Service results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Indoctrination, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 68.4% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 510.471 faulty-reasoning hits from 210.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (15,524 of 26,394 speakers). This US Forest Service is better (less manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
US Forest Service
Speaker details
Total words: 210.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510041.2% percentile
25.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos210.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 68.4%68.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.5%28.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 68.4%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos