Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,251 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kylie Mohr results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 4,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,354 of 6,263 authors). This Kylie Mohr is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Kylie Mohr
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Kylie Mohr (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,004
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos