Author summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pierce Sharpe results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 1,145 hits. Analysis detected 6,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,945 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (2,144 of 6,192 authors). This Pierce Sharpe is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Pierce Sharpe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠66%Pierce Sharpe (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,945
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 19.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0%Horn Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos