Speaker summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos68.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ursula Jones Dickson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 43.1% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 238.2 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,190 of 28,364 speakers). This Ursula Jones Dickson is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Ursula Jones Dickson
Speaker details
Total words: 68.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
32.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos68.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 43.1%43.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.5%21.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos