Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Hall results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,160 hits . Analysis detected 10,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,780 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,957 of 6,629 authors). This Alex Hall is better (less manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group. Alex Hall
Author details
Total words: 16,780
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst