An Oakland bank was hit twice within 6 days. Police say it was the same armed robber 30%

By Aldo Toledo3%

7/21/2026, 12:24:58 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 314 faulty-reasoning hits from 182 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.9% and a BS Rank of 30% (15,365 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the article peer group.

A 67-year-old man accused of robbing an Oakland bank twice in less than a week has been charged with numerous felonies, Alameda County prosecutors said Monday. 
Authorities said Michael Savage carried out armed robberies at the Wells Fargo branch at 901 Franklin St. in Chinatown on July 9 and July 15. 
Both robberies occurred shortly after 9 a.m. 
Prosecutors charged Savage with robbery, false imprisonment and other felony offenses. 
The criminal complaint also includes sentencing enhancements alleging he has multiple prior convictions for violent crimes that qualify as strikes under California law. 
Court records show Savage was convicted of second-degree robbery in 2014 and 2017. 
“These were brazen robberies that terrorized bank employees and customers, and left innocent people in fear for their lives,” District Attorney Ursula Jones Dickson said in a statement. 
Savage was scheduled to be arraigned Tuesday in Alameda County Superior Court at the Wiley W. 
Manuel Courthouse in Oakland. 
He remained in custody at Santa Rita Jail as of Monday afternoon. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.3%Aldo Toledo: 1.8%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.8%Confirmation Bias20.3%This article: 4.9%Aldo Toledo: 0.4%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Anchoring Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.5%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 3.8%Aldo Toledo: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic3.8%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 2.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.6%Aldo Toledo: 2.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 5.5%Framing Effect12.6%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 28.0%Aldo Toledo: 6.8%San Francisco Chronicle: 6.4%Negativity Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.7%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.9%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.5%Aldo Toledo: 2.8%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Recency Bias11.5%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.3%Aldo Toledo: 3.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 4.7%Appeal to Authority25.3%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 1.7%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 15.4%Aldo Toledo: 4.1%San Francisco Chronicle: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion15.4%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 1.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 15.4%Aldo Toledo: 1.9%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)15.4%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.4%Aldo Toledo: 0.3%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.0%Unattributed Quote4.4%This article: 15.4%Aldo Toledo: 2.2%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection15.4%This article: 15.4%Aldo Toledo: 2.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice15.4%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aldo Toledo: 0.0%San Francisco Chronicle: 2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

182 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers53%attributed speech86writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coveragePolice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageAlameda County prosecutors • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageProsecutors • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlameda County prosecutors • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageUrsula Jones Dickson • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ursula Jones Dickson

100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words29% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ursula Jones Dickson: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Ursula Jones Dickson: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.