Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of Stavanger Museum of Archaeology results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 254.549 faulty-reasoning hits from 244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,931 of 28,364 speakers). This University of Stavanger Museum of Archaeology is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
University of Stavanger Museum of Archaeology
Speaker details
Total words: 244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos244 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos