Speaker summary
â 78%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of Pennsylvania results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 211 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of â 59% (11,890 of 28,364 speakers). This University of Pennsylvania is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
University of Pennsylvania
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
40.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0â100%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often