Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University of North Carolina results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,037 of 28,364 speakers). This University of North Carolina is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
University of North Carolina
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos